The official site of the SHOWTIME Original Series Polyamory. Find out about new episodes, watch previews, Polyamory: Married & Dating. Watch Now. Polyamory married and dating tv show wiki. Polyamory: Married & Dating. ^ showtime announces premiere dates for spring/summer deadline hollywood march 1. Polyamory is the practice of, or desire for, intimate relationships with more than one partner, For the reality TV show, see Polyamory: Married & Dating. Practice .
Polyamory married and dating wikipedia - About The Series
Feelings such as envy and jealousy are not shunned, but can be addressed through non-violent communication—they are not always resolved, but they can be mitigated or lessened. Polys have also coined the neologism "compersion" to describe a person feeling joy for another person e. Misunderstandings[ edit ] From the monogamous perspective, polyamory can be quite the foreign idea, simply because monogamous culture has dictated through media , religion and law.
There are those who consider it to be "experimentation" or a "phase" just like experimentation can occur with sexuality or gender identity. However, many polys come to understand that polyamory is in their nature, and therefore part of their identity. Others regard it as a conscious lifestyle choice. Polygamy[ edit ] Another popular misunderstanding is conflating polyamory with polygamy.
However, because polygamy is often culturally understood as polygyny e. Polygamy is also recognized as having multiple spouses hence the "-gamy" and thus multiple marriages, whereas polyamory doesn't necessarily require ritualized marriages legal or otherwise.
There are polyfidelitous arrangements where members consider their partnerships as marriages, and participate in ceremonies such as hand-binding or exchanging rings, but these arrangements do not define polyamory—they are simply a version of it. Swinging[ edit ] Since polyamory and swinging are under the same umbrella of non-monogamy, many people confuse the two. This is not actually true, but neither are they completely distinct.
It's better to think of polyamory as a lifestyle or relationship philosophy, where as swinging is an activity. To compare, one doesn't self-identify as a "baseball player" as part of their nature, but rather as part of their activities or profession. Many polys do not swing; and most swingers are not polyamorous. Think of them as hot and cold taps on the shower faucet; each non-monogamous person adjusts their taps different to whatever level is comfortable for them.
Orgiastic lifestyles within polyamory are not impossible, but the "poly agenda" is pretty similar to the " gay agenda "—working to pay bills, spending time with family, doing laundry and figuring out what to watch on Netflix in the evenings.
Cheating[ edit ] Then there are those who feel that polyamory is simply cheating, because it involves violating the tacit agreement as defined by the mononormative society that is a monogamous relationship. Poly authors have used the dictionary definition of cheating as "the purposeful and deceitful violation of a pre-arranged agreement", applying just as well to polyamory as it does to monogamous relationships, board games and peace treaties. Cheating can certainly occur in polyamory—particularly in polyfidelitous arrangements where the inclusion of a new partner requires knowledge and consent of the other or all members of the arrangement.
Since every arrangement or network of relationships is different, the definition for what constitutes cheating can differ. Harmful to children[ edit ] The religious right and others certainly consider polyamory to be a slippery slope to more sinful ways and often invoke the " think of the children! Just as has been shown with same sex marriage , loving arrangements between any number of adults are beneficial to a child's development, and contentious arrangements can be harmful.
Rarity[ edit ] More generally, there is a misunderstanding that non-monogamy is rare. What is actually true is that consensual, honest non-monogamy is rare. Heck, some are involved in less than one.
Some people think the definition is a bit loose, but it's got to be fairly roomy to fit the wide range of poly arrangements out there. The practice, state or ability of having more than one sexual loving relationship at the same time, with the full knowledge and consent of all partners involved. This term was meant to be inclusive, and in that context, we have never intended to particularly exclude " swinging " per se, if practitioners thereof wished to adopt the term and include themselves The two essential ingredients of the concept of polyamory are more than one; and loving.
That is, it is expected that the people in such relationships have a loving emotional bond, are involved in each other's lives multi-dimensionally, and care for each other.
This term is not intended to apply to merely casual recreational sex, anonymous orgies, one-night stands, pick-ups, prostitution , "cheating," serial monogamy, or the popular definition of swinging as "mate-swapping" parties. However, no single definition of "polyamory" has universal acceptance. Some object to the idea that one must currently be participating in multiple relationships to be considered polyamorous. It is generally agreed that polyamory involves multiple consensual, loving relationships or openness to such , but beyond that the term is as ambiguous as the word love itself.
A relationship is more likely to be called "polyamorous" if at least one relationship is long-term, involves some sort of commitment e. For instance, somebody who has multiple sexual partners might form strong loving friendships with them, without feeling romantic love for them. Whether such a person identifies as "polyamorous", or as a swinger, or uses some other term, often depends more on their attitude towards other "polyamorists", "swingers", etc.
Different terms emphasise different aspects of the interaction, but "swinging" and "polyamory" are both broad in what they can refer to. This allows for a certain degree of overlap. Similarly, an open relationship in which all participants are long-term friends might be considered "polyamorous" under broader usages of the word but excluded from some of the tighter usages see further discussion below. There is enough overlap between these concepts that the expression "open relationship" is also sometimes used as a catch-all substitute when speaking to people who may not be familiar with the term "polyamory".
However, some practitioners of polyfidelity have posed objection to the idea that having multiple partners necessitates that they are open. The terms primary or primary relationship s and secondary or secondary relationship s are often used as a means to indicate a hierarchy of different relationships in a person's life.
Thus a woman with a husband and another partner might refer to the husband as her "primary". Of course, this is in addition to any other terms a person might use, such as "lover", "casual date", "friend", "other half", and so on. The term tertiary can refer to ongoing casual relationships, though it is much less commonly used.
Another model, sometimes referred to as intimate network, may include relationships of varying significance to the people involved, but people who practice it do not explicitly label relationships primary or secondary, and hierarchies may be fluid and vague or nonexistent. The most common symbol is the heart combined with the infinity sign. Another symbol is an image of a parrot , since "Polly" is a common name for these birds.
Polyfidelity , which involves multiple romantic relationships with sexual contact restricted to specific partners in a group which may include all members of that group.
Sub-relationships, which distinguish between "primary" and "secondary" relationships e. Polygamy polygyny and polyandry , in which one person marries several spouses who may or may not be married to or have a romantic relationship with one another. Group relationships and group marriage , in which all consider themselves associated to one another, popularized to some extent by Robert A.
Networks of interconnecting relationships, where a particular person may have relationships of varying degrees of importance with various people. So-called "geometric" arrangements, which are described by the number of people involved and their relationship connections. Examples include "triads" and "quads", along with "V" and "N" geometries. The connecting member of a V relationship is sometimes referred to as a "hinge" or "pivot", and the partners thereby indirectly connected are referred to as the "arms".
The arm partners are not as closely bonded to each other as each arm partner is to the pivot. This can be contrasted with a "triangle", in which all partners are directly connected and all are bonded to each other with comparable strength. A triad could be either a V or a triangle. Some people in sexually exclusive relationships may still self-describe as polyamorous, if they have significant emotional ties to more than one other person.
Additionally, people who self-describe as polyamorous may accept monogamous relationships with specific partners, either because this is the negotiated agreement, or because with that partner monogamy feels "right" whereas for a different partner perhaps it would not be as appropriate.
Broadly, "open" usually refers to the sexual aspect of a non-closed relationship, whereas polyamory involves the extension of a relationship by allowing bonds to form which may be sexual or otherwise as additional long term relationships: Some relationships place strict restrictions on partners e.
Some relationships permit sex outside the primary relationship, but not love cf swinging ; such relationships are open, but not polyamorous.
Some polyamorists consider "polyamory" to be their philosophical orientation -- they believe themselves capable and desirous of multiple loves -- whereas "open relationship" is used as a logistical description: They would say of themselves, for instance, "I am polyamorous; my primary partner and I have an open relationship But such laws do not usually permit marriage, nor do they give full legal protection to all partners equally, nor as strong protection e.
They are considered no different from people who live together or date under other circumstances. Usually one couple, at most, can elect to be treated as "married". Bigamy is the act of marrying one person while already being married to another, and is legally prohibited in most jurisdictions. Some bigamy statutes are broad enough to potentially encompass polyamorous relationships involving cohabitation, even if none of the participants claim marriage to more than one partner.
For instance, under Utah Code , 'A person is guilty of bigamy when, knowing he has a husband or wife or knowing the other person has a husband or wife, the person purports to marry another person or cohabits with another person.
There are exceptions to this; in North Carolina a spouse can sue a third party for causing "loss of affection" in or "criminal conversation" adultery with their spouse  , and more than twenty states in the US have laws against adultery  although they are infrequently enforced. New Jersey's Domestic Partnership Act can be combined with marriage in order to legally connect any N-ary group of persons imperfectly, though using a combination of marriage and domestic partnership , provided that any of the following is true: But 8 females and 5 males would not; nor would 5 females and 3 males; nor would a single-sex community of more than two people.
The extension of laws which use a test similar to the UK test of "married or living together as married" to multiple-partner relationships i. If marriage is intended, most countries provide for both a religious marriage, and a civil ceremony sometimes combined , both of which recognize and formalize the relationship. Few countries recognize or will permit marriages with three or more partners either legally or religiously.
One debate centers around the relative merits of an all-with-all approach to marriage whereby three or more persons are all joined together at the same time within a single marriage and dyadic networks whereby existing laws against bigamy are revised such that people are perfectly free to be concurrently married to multiple other persons, provided that each such new marriage is preceded by a legal notification regarding the pending new marriage to all those to whom one is already married; failure to provide that legal notification would then constitute the updated crime of bigamy.
Dyadic networks would result in what might be thought of as a "molecular" family structure — one which might be best represented by the molecular diagrams commonly used in chemistry. In this way, marriage would remain a dyadic relationship i.
Dyadic networks can correctly represent any situation associated with the "all-with-all" paradigm, as well as many situations that the "all-with-all" paradigm cannot deal with. A "complete" dyadic network would take the form of a complete graph , in which every person is pairwise married to every other person, thus correctly representing any situation associated with the "all-with-all" paradigm.
A dyadic network may also represent situations in which some persons are pairwise married to some members of the dyadic network but not to all of them "V" and "N" geometries, for example — these are situations that the "all-with-all" marriage paradigm is unable to accurately represent.
The "all-with-all" marriage paradigm assumes that everyone is equally involved with everyone else in the group — one global marriage agreement has to fit every participant at the same time. But dyadic network marriages separately define the terms of each specific 2-person relationship, and these dyadic marriages do not typically happen at the same time A marries B, B marries C "V" structure , C marries D "N" structure , etc. Participants in a dyadic network need not even be aware of the specific terms of marriage agreements existing elsewhere within the same dyadic network.
Under the "all-with-all" marriage paradigm, when irreconcilable differences arise there can be no alternative to a complete separation — one person cannot divorce another without ending the entire marriage agreement for everyone involved. But dyadic networks can function in much the same way as watertight compartmentalization functions in naval vessels, i. An intense disagreement between two persons takes place within the context of their marriage, and need not greatly involve or threaten the relationships between other participants.
Within a well-connected dyadic network, a divorce between two persons need not result in a complete separation of the network — for example, a dyadic network with triangle geometry would simply turn into a dyadic network with "V" geometry. An "all-with-all" marriage can only exist or cease to exist. In contrast, the shape of a dyadic network can dynamically change over time. Divorces subtract connections, and marriages add connections.
The dyadic network itself either changes shape, separates into two dyadic networks, or merges into another dyadic network, depending on the precise nature of the newly added or subtracted connection.
The maximum size of an "all-with-all" marriage is limited by the fact that every participant must be aware of the existence of every other participant otherwise the global marriage contract would be invalid, because it could not satisfy the legal condition known as a "meeting of the minds". But since a dyadic network relies only upon every participant's local knowledge of his or her own direct partners, its size is theoretically unlimited.
The dyadic network paradigm is so powerful that it is theoretically capable of managing a situation in which every adult on earth is legally joined together in a single enormous dyadic network. Thus, with the dyadic network model, the idea of "many loves" is directly translated into a practical reality, and the "infinity" symbol representing love without limits is directly matched by a marriage model capable of handling an infinitely large number of participants.
However, the "all-with-all" or "dyadic" are not the only possible forms of polyamorous marriage. As another example, entry and exit of a marriage contract may follow the model of shareholders in a corporation or members in a limited liability corporation. Polyamory as a lifestyle Separate from polyamory as a philosophical basis for relationship, are the practical ways in which people who live a polyamorous lifestyle arrange their lives, the issues they face, and how these compare to those living a monogamous lifestyle.
Values within polyamory Main article: Values within polyamory Relationships classed as polyamorous involve an emotional bond and often a longer term intent, though these distinctions are a topic open to debate and interpretation. Many people in the swinging and polyamory communities see both practices as part of a broader spectrum of open intimacy and sexuality. Also note that the values discussed here are ideals. As with any ideals, their adherents sometimes fall short of the mark — but major breaches of a polyamorous relationship's ideals are taken as seriously as such breaches would be in any other relationship.
Common values cited within such relationships include: Fact Fidelity and loyalty: Many polyamorists define fidelity as being faithful to the promises and agreements they have made, rather than in terms of per se sexual exclusivity. Having a secret sexual relationship which violated one's negotiated agreements would be seen as lacking fidelity.
Polyamorists generally base definitions of commitment on considerations other than sexual exclusivity, e. Most polyamorists emphasize respect, trust and honesty for all partners. This requires that each partner will support, and not undermine, the other, and will not deliberately use a secondary relationship to harm another party or relationship.
Because there is no "standard model" for polyamorous relationships, and reliance upon common expectations may not be realistic, polyamorists often advocate explicitly deciding the ground rules of their relationships with all concerned, and often emphasize that this should be an ongoing process of communication and respect.
Polyamorists usually take a pragmatic approach to their relationships; they accept that sometimes they and their partners will make mistakes and fail to live up to these ideals, and that communication is important for repairing any breaches. Polyamorists believe that restrictions on other deep relationships are not for the best, as they tend to replace trust with a framework of ownership and control.
They tend to see their partner's partners in terms of the gain to their partner's life rather than the threat to their own see compersion. Poly relationships do vary and some can be possessive or provide for the primary partner's veto or approval, whilst others are asymmetrical —possessive one way, but not the other.
Sharing of domestic burden Edit Claimed benefits of a polyamorous lifestyle include the following: Emotional and similar support structure provided by other committed adults within the family unit. A wider range of experience, skills, resources, and perspectives that multiple adults bring to a relationship. The ability to share chores and child supervision, reducing domestic and child rearing pressure upon adults' time without needing to pay for outside child carers.
Greatly reduced per capita cost of living. Increased financial stability—the loss of one income is not the entirety of the family income if only one parent works , or half the family income if both parents work , but may be far less. Specific issues affecting polyamorous relationships Edit Polyamorists cite the human tendency towards jealousy and possessiveness as major hurdles in polyamory, and also as personal limitations to overcome: When people are viewed, even inadvertently, as possessions, they become a commodity, a valuable one at that.
Just as most people are reluctant to let go of what little money that they have, people are also reluctant to "share" their beloved. These sorts of inferiority complexes must be resolved, completely, before a polyamorous relationship can be truly successful"  An editorial article on the polyamory website Polyamoryonline. Polyamory social settings involving children.
The author, herself in a polyamorous relationship of three adults, comments that: After this was established, we sort of fell into our patterns of school, practices, just normal life in general.
The "dyadic networks" model  calls for the revision of existing laws against bigamy to permit married persons to enter into additional marriages, provided that they have first given legal notice to their existing marital partner or partners. Recognizing this complexity actually explains why these arrangements can actually be difficult to maintain, but it is also that recognition that facilitates the arrangement and addressing all the issues that can occur within it. When this happens, communication is an important channel for repairing any damage caused by such breaches. Wider range of experience, skills, resources and perspectives that multiple adults bring to a relationship.
- STREAM SHOWTIME NOW
- Navigation menu